UPDATE: Rolling Stone found liable for defamation for rape story

DCW50 News

Nearly two years since it was originally published, Rolling Stone’s discredited article about an alleged gang rape at a University of Virginia frat house will take center stage in court on Monday, October 17, 2016. The magazine is heading to trial in Charlottesville, Virginia in a defamation lawsuit brought by a UVA administrator named Nicole Eramo who says the story portrayed her as callous and insensitive to the plight of an alleged rape victim.

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — A jury found Rolling Stone magazine liable for defamation on Friday over its explosive and later discredited story about a gang rape at a University of Virginia fraternity house.

The magazine’s publisher and the reporter, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, were also found liable.

The jury found in favor of Nicole Eramo, a school administrator who said that the story portrayed her as callous and insensitive to the plight of an alleged rape victim. She is seeking $7.5 million. Damages will be determined later.

In the story, “A Rape on Campus,” a woman identified only as Jackie claimed that she had been beaten and raped by seven men at the Phi Kappa Psi house. Eramo said that she was “the chief villain of the story,” in part because she was described as discouraging Jackie from going to the police.

Eramo wept in court as the verdict was read.

“The jury’s verdict is a complete vindication of Nicole Eramo, and a complete repudiation of Rolling Stone’s and Ms. Erdely’s false and defamatory article,” said one of her lawyers, Libby Locke. “We are looking forward to the damages phase of the trial.”

The 9,000-word article was met with outrage nationwide when it was published in November 2014, and the school suspended all fraternities.

But Jackie’s claims were quickly questioned. Charlottesville police found no evidence that the rape happened. And journalists and readers were stunned to learn that Erdely never spoke to the men identified as Jackie’s attackers.

The federal jury in Virginia was composed of eight women and two men. They reached their decision on the third day of deliberations after hearing two weeks of testimony.

Erdely was found liable for parts of the original story and for interviews she gave about it.

The jury found that the magazine and publisher, Wenner Media, were liable for defamation for republishing the story several weeks later with an editor’s note acknowledging doubts about Jackie’s account.

Rolling Stone retracted the article in April 2015 after a review by the Columbia Journalism School concluded that it was a “story of journalistic failure.” The review also said the article risked spreading the idea that women invent rape allegations.

In a statement after the verdict, the magazine acknowledged “journalistic mistakes” in an attempt to “present this complicated issue from the perspective of a survivor.”

“It is our deep hope that our failings do not deflect from the pervasive issues discussed in the piece, and that reporting on sexual assault cases ultimately results in campus policies that better protect our students,” the magazine said.

Eramo told ABC News before the trial that the article changed her life.

“I’m never going to be where I was on November 18 of 2014,” Eramo said, referring to the day before it was published. “But I can hopefully recognize that person again.”

Rolling Stone faces another lawsuit brought by Phi Kappa Psi for $25 million. That trial is scheduled to begin next year. A separate lawsuit brought by individual members of the fraternity was dismissed.

Trademark and Copyright 2020 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

DCW50 Exclusives

More DCW50 Exclusives

More News

More News


Latest News

More DCW50 News