Here’s how senators plan to vote on Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Neil Gorsuch is seen here being questioned in the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 22, 2017..

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Republicans are considering their next step now that the confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch are over and many Democrats are planning to filibuster the nomination.

The Senate Judiciary Committee met Monday to consider Gorsuch’s nomination, but as expected, Democrats requested that the nomination be held for one week, so the committee is expected to vote Monday, April 3.

Republicans, who number 52 in the Senate, need eight Democrats to join them in order to end the expected filibuster, or in more technical terms, invoke cloture.

If they don’t reach 60 votes, they can still get around it by changing the rules and requiring only a simple majority, or 51 votes, to end the debate.

So far, only two Democrats — Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Heidi Heitkamp — have said they are planning to vote for Gorsuch. No other Democrats so far have said they would vote for Gorsuch or vote for cloture on his nomination, which means he or she would vote with Republicans to advance his nomination.

As of Friday morning, 31 Democrats have said or suggested they will filibuster. Another three Democrats have said they’ll oppose Gorsuch in the final confirmation vote, but it’s unclear where they stand on a potential filibuster.

Republicans are targeting a dozen Democrats who represent mostly red states or states that President Donald Trump won last year, urging them to call for an up-or-down vote in the Senate, which is code for not supporting a filibuster. Three of those senators — Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan — have said they will support the filibuster.

The rule change is also known as the “nuclear option,” a controversial move that Democrats took more than three years ago for all presidential nominees other than Supreme Court justices.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has suggested he is willing to use the nuclear option — even flatly declaring Gorsuch will be confirmed by the time the Senate departs for the mid-April recess — although he hasn’t said definitively that he will use it.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has repeatedly argued that if Gorsuch can’t get to 60 votes on his own, then Republicans shouldn’t change the rules, but “change the nominee.”

Democrats are still fuming over Republican action last year to block President Barack Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland, keeping the seat vacant until a new president was sworn in.

Here’s what Democrats have said about Gorsuch.

Democrats who will vote for Gorsuch:

1. Sen. Joe Manchin (West Virginia) — “I will vote to confirm Judge Neil Gorsuch to be the ninth justice on the Supreme Court.” Tweet and statement from 3/30/2017

2. Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (North Dakota) — “After doing my due diligence by meeting with Judge Gorsuch and reviewing his record and testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, I’ve decided to vote in favor of his confirmation.” Statement from 3/30/2017

Democrats who plan to filibuster:

1. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (New York) — “My vote will be ‘no’. … To my Republican friends who think that if Judge Gorsuch fails to reach 60 votes, we ought to change the rules, I say: If this nominee cannot earn 60 votes, a bar met by each of President Obama’s nominees, and President Bush’s last two nominees, the answer isn’t to change the rules, it’s to change the nominee.” — Statement on Senate floor on 3/23/2017

2. Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vermont) — “After careful consideration of Judge Gorsuch’s record, I have concluded that I will not vote to confirm him to be an associate justice of the Supreme Court, and I will not support Republican efforts to change the rules to choke off debate and ram the nomination through the Senate.” — Statement on 3/23/2017

3. Sen. Bob Casey (Pennsylvania) — “I don’t believe that Judge Gorsuch, his judicial approach, would ensure fairness for workers and families in Pennsylvania and indeed across the country, and I will not support his nomination. … If you seek to become a justice of the Supreme Court … you ought to be able to rack up 60 votes … I think that’s the standard you should be able to meet.” — Press call with reporters on 3/23/2017

4. Sen. Ron Wyden (Oregon) — “I will vote no on his nomination and I will vote to sustain a filibuster.” — Statement on 3/23/2017

5. Sen. Patty Murray (Washington) — “After careful consideration, I will be voting against the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch, and I will oppose a cloture motion ending debate.” — Statement 3/24/2017

6. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) — “I believe Judge Gorsuch’s nomination should be blocked.” — Op-ed in the Boston Globe on 3/20/2017

7. Sen. Jeff Merkley (Oregon) — Merkley has long been supportive of the filibuster and reiterated that on Twitter on 3/29/2017. “I will not stand idly by and allow the people’s government to be stolen. We must restore our #WeThePeople democracy and #StopGorsuch.”

8. Sen. Tom Carper (Delaware) — “Ultimately, I believe that moving forward with Judge Gorsuch’s nomination will send a signal that it’s acceptable to put partisan politics over fidelity to our Constitution. It is not. While I do not believe that two wrongs make a right, I believe this may be our only opportunity to right a historic wrong. Therefore, I am left with no other choice but to oppose Judge Gorsuch’s nomination until we find agreement on moving Judge Garland’s nomination forward at the same time.” — Statement on 3/29/2017

9. Sen. Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) — “President Trump and his nominee need to earn 60 votes in the Senate,” said Baldwin. “I will not be one of them.” — Journal Sentinel article on 2/2/2017

10. Sen. Bill Nelson (Florida) — “I will vote no on the motion to invoke cloture and, if that succeeds, I will vote no on his confirmation.” — Statement on 3/27/2017

11. Sen. Cory Booker (New Jersey) — “This is going to be a real test. I’m not sure what’s going to happen, but I’m going to oppose Judge Gorsuch every step of the way. A 60-vote threshold is not something new for Supreme Court nominees to overcome. It helps ensure that presidents seek nominees whose views are in the mainstream.” Interview with on 2/5/2017

12. Sen. Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) — “I have concluded that I will not be supporting Neil Gorsuch for this opening and so I very much support a 60-vote threshold.” — Interview with Wolf Blitzer on 3/27/2017

13. Sen. Tom Udall (New Mexico) — “Every recent Supreme Court nominee has received at least 60 votes either for cloture or confirmation. Judge Gorsuch will be subject to the same test, and therefore, I will vote no on his confirmation, including cloture.” — Statement on 3/24/2017

14. Sen. Jack Reed (Rhode Island) — “I will vote no on cloture and no on his nomination.” — Statement on 3/24/2017

15. Sen. Chris Murphy (Connecticut) — “I will oppose both cloture, and if necessary, final passage, on Judge Gorsuch’s nomination,” Murphy wrote in a post on Facebook 3/28/2017

He has also expressed some support for sustaining the filibuster. “Yes I am not for changing the rules of the Senate on Judge Gorsuch’s nomination. Whether we like it or not, the rules of the Senate requires 60 votes for closure and that shouldn’t change for Gorsuch. It’s been the case for every other vote that hasn’t been exempt for that requirement.” — To reporters on 3/27/2017

16. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) — “Judge Gorsuch needed to convince me he would not join the posse that has relentlessly stretched the law to benefit Republican partisans and corporations at the expense of everyone else. He did not. He will not get my vote.” — Statement on 3/24/2017

He also told reporters on 3/27/2017 that he will vote “no” on cloture, meaning he will be part of the filibuster.

17. Sen. Tim Kaine (Virginia) — “Judge Gorsuch’s selective activism in restricting women’s rights and his framing of women making their own health decisions as ‘the wrongdoing of others’ are jarring and do not demonstrate a philosophy that belongs on the Supreme Court. I will oppose his nomination.” — Statement on 3/29/2017

He has also expressed some support for sustaining the filibuster. “The way I look at it is the Supreme Court is the only position that requires you to get to a 60-vote threshold, which means it mandates that there be some bipartisanship and that is appropriate. Life tenure. Highest court in the land. Should have to get to 60 votes.” — To reporters on 3/27/2017

18. Sen. Kamala Harris (California) — “Exactly yes,” Harris said when asked by David Axelrod for “Axe Files” whether she’s urging Democrats to force supporters to produce 60 votes.

Harris has also said she won’t vote to confirm Gorsuch. “I cannot support his nomination.” — Op-ed in San Francisco Chronicle on 3/24/2017

19. Sen. Al Franken (Minnesota) — “Earlier today, I sat down with WCCO’s Esme Murphy and announced that I will be voting no on Judge Neil Gorsuch because I fear he’d be a part of a U.S. Supreme Court that would put the interests of large corporations before Minnesotans and all Americans.” — Statement on Facebook on 3/26/2017

20. Sen. Debbie Stabenow (Michigan) — “After carefully reviewing his record and listening to his testimony last week in the Senate Judiciary Committee, I have concluded that supporting the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the United States Supreme Court is not in the best interests of the people of Michigan whom I am proud to represent.” — Statement on 3/28/2017

A spokeswoman for Stabenow confirmed that the senator will also vote “no” on cloture.

21. Sen. Ed Markey (Massachusetts) — “I will not support the nomination of Judge Gorsuch.” — Statement on 1/31/2017

A spokeswoman for Markey confirmed that he will also vote “no” on cloture.

22. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (Maryland) — “After the Senate’s unprecedented abdication of constitutional responsibility with respect to the Garland nomination, we must begin to restore faith in the Supreme Court. That requires a nominee who is widely viewed to be an impartial administrator of justice – someone who is truly in the mainstream and who can earn the support of at least 60 senators. I will insist that this nominee be held to that standard.” — Statement on 3/28/2017

23. Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (Illinois) — “I don’t know the answer to that. … I just announced that I’ll be voting against Gorsuch and for the filibuster — basically require 60 votes.” — To reporters on 3/28/2017

24. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) — “After meeting with Judge Gorsuch and reviewing his record and testimony, I cannot support his nomination to serve on the Supreme Court .. .As Judge Gorsuch’s nomination comes to the floor, I will support a 60-vote threshold for approval, an appropriate high bar that has been met by seven of the eight current Supreme Court justices.” — Statement on 3/28/2017

25. Sen. Gary Peters (Michigan) — The senator told CNN on 3/28/2017 that he will be voting against cloture and against Gorsuch in the final confirmation vote.

26. Sen. Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) — “I will vote against this nomination, and I support maintaining the traditional 60-vote threshold for confirming Supreme Court nominees.” — Medium post on 3/28/2017

27. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) — A spokesperson confirmed to CNN on 3/28/2017 that Klobuchar will oppose Gorsuch’s nomination and supported the 60 vote threshold.

28. Sen. Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) — “…I intend to oppose his nomination and cannot support advancing the nominee under these circumstances.” — Statement on 3/29/2017

29. Sen. Tammy Duckworth (Illinois) — “I cannot vote to confirm him. … I refuse to vote to end debate on a nominee who refuses to provide any answers to my questions.” — Statement on 3/30/2017

30. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) — A spokesman confirmed on 3/31/2017 that the senator is voting no on cloture and no on confirmation.

31. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut) — “In short, he has left us with substantial doubt. … That doubt is why I cannot support this nomination, and why I will work to block it using every tool at my disposal.” — Statement and op-ed on 3/31/2017

Democrats who plan to vote no on confirmation but it’s unclear whether they will filibuster:

1. Sen. Sherrod Brown (Ohio) — “I cannot support any #SCOTUSnominee who does not recognize that corporations are not people. Read my full statement” — Twitter on 1/31/2017

2. Sen. Pat Leahy (Vermont) — “As of now I do not believe I can support Judge Gorsuch. He did not answer basic Qs & was selected by extreme interest groups w an agenda…I am never inclined to filibuster a SCOTUS nom. But I need to see how Judge Gorsuch answers my written Qs, under oath, before deciding.” — Twitter on 3/27/2017

On 3/28/2017, Leahy said he was still waiting to see the written responses.

3. Sen. Ben Cardin (Maryland) — “I came out today against the nominee, so I’ll be voting ‘no’ on the substance. I’m waiting to see what the Republican leadership (does), how they present the nomination on the floor and how they work with the Democrats. There’s still a lot of anxiety out there because of the way they handled the Garland nomination. So I will wait to see how they handle this nomination before deciding what I will do on procedural votes.” — To CNN on 3/28/2017

Democrats who are unclear on both the filibuster and confirmation

Sen. Mark Warner (Virginia) — He told reporters on 3/28/2017 that he was still reading up on Gorsuch but was concerned about his “evasive answers.”

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) — She told CNN on 3/28/2017 that she not announced her decision.

Sen. Chris Coons (Delaware) — “He will get an up or down vote. Senator Schumer, our minority leader, has said it’s going to be a 60-vote margin. I doubt he’s going to get 60 votes. The question then becomes what do we do? There’s a lot of finger pointing; a lot of Democrats justifiably still very mad about the treatment of Merrick Garland….I don’t think he’s going to get 60 votes.” — Interview on MSNBC on 3/27/2017

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (California) — “Well let’s wait for next week, OK? And then I’ll make myself very clear.” — To reporters on 3/27/2017

Sen. Jon Tester — “Filibuster and the vote on him are the same in my book. It’s always been that way since I’ve been here.” — To reporters on 3/27/2017

Sen. Brian Schatz (Hawaii) — Schatz told CNN on 3/27/2017 that he hasn’t met with the judge yet so he hasn’t announced — but he’s not undecided.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (Missouri) — “Obviously it’s a really difficult situation where both alternatives, I think, have a lot of danger.” — To reporters on 3/30/2017

Sen. Maria Cantwell (Washington) — She met with Gorsuch on 3/29/2017 but has not announced her decision.

Sen. Joe Donnelly (Indiana) — “Give my office a call, thanks.” — To reporters on 3/30/2017

Sen. Bob Menendez (New Jersey) — “Still deciding…I’ve said all along that when I come to a conclusion on how I’m voting on Gorsuch, I’ll decide on how I’m voting in the whole process.” — To reporters on 3/28/2017

Sen. Angus King (Maine) — He told CNN on 3/30/2017 that he still hasn’t decided.

Sen. Michael Bennet (Colorado) — He has not announced his decision.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.