Jury in Rolling Stone defamation case begins day 3 of deliberations

Nearly two years since it was originally published, Rolling Stone's discredited article about an alleged gang rape at a University of Virginia frat house will take center stage in court on Monday, October 17, 2016. The magazine is heading to trial in Charlottesville, Virginia in a defamation lawsuit brought by a UVA administrator named Nicole Eramo who says the story portrayed her as callous and insensitive to the plight of an alleged rape victim.

Nearly two years since it was originally published, Rolling Stone's discredited article about an alleged gang rape at a University of Virginia frat house will take center stage in court on Monday, October 17, 2016. The magazine is heading to trial in Charlottesville, Virginia in a defamation lawsuit brought by a UVA administrator named Nicole Eramo who says the story portrayed her as callous and insensitive to the plight of an alleged rape victim.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Jurors began a third day of deliberations Friday in the defamation case against Rolling Stone and its discredited article about a gang rape at a University of Virginia fraternity house.

The suit was brought by UVA administrator Nicole Eramo, who says the article, “A Rape on Campus,” portrayed her as insensitive to the plight of an alleged rape victim. She seeks $7.5 million from the magazine, publisher Wenner Media and reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely.

A judge has ruled that Eramo is a public figure, which means the 10-person jury needs to determine whether the magazine acted with “actual malice” — making statements it knew were false, or showing reckless disregard.

Jurors have more than two weeks of testimony to consider. During deliberations Wednesday, they asked for and were provided a copy of the magazine.

The central figure in the story, a student identified only as Jackie, alleged she had been gang raped by seven men at the Phi Kappa Psi house. Erdely’s 9,000-word article was met with disgust nationwide when it was published in November 2014, and the school suspended all fraternities.

But Jackie’s claims were soon questioned. Charlottesville police found no evidence that the rape happened. And journalists and readers were stunned to learn that Erdely never spoke to the men identified as Jackie’s attackers.

The magazine retracted the article after a review by the Columbia Journalism School concluded that it was a “story of journalistic failure.” The review also said the article risked spreading the idea that women invent rape allegations.

Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner said in a deposition that he didn’t agree with the retraction. The magazine has acknowledged mistakes and said it “firmly believed in the credibility of Jackie” when it published the story.

Eramo told ABC News before the trial that the article changed her life.

“I’m never going to be where I was on November 18 of 2014,” Eramo said, referring to the day before it was published. “But I can hopefully recognize that person again.”

Rolling Stone faces another lawsuit brought by Phi Kappa Psi for $25 million. That trial is scheduled to begin next year. A separate lawsuit brought by individual members of the fraternity was dismissed.